From the start, the VGB has been a mess. But that mess has only been exacerbated by a system that lets professionals with business conflicts of interest write standards.
- And the Winner Is...
I’m honored to be part of an industry that has, at its heart, the noble calling to improve and save lives.
- More Powerful than Oprah
Campaigners want the wizard of O to do a special episode on the drowning pandemic. But other efforts are worthy of support, too.
Even before I became editor of Aquatics International, I had great respect for lifeguards. I took a junior lifeguarding class back in my hometown, and even thought about becoming a guard.
In my role at the magazine, I’ve developed even more respect for guards. Current and former lifesavers are some of the most well-trained, passionate and devoted people I’ve ever met. They are asked to shoulder the ultimate responsibility: life itself. They also happen to be some of the lowest paid professional rescuers on the planet.
So imagine my surprise, quickly followed by consternation, when I saw a Tweet about union lifeguards making more than $200,000 in Newport Beach, Calif. On the face of it, the figure sounds outrageous. And that’s exactly the point.
The group behind this lifeguard pay smear is the very same group that went after teachers in Wisconsin. Their goal is to break unions, and they’ll use whatever disinformation and conflation they can to sway public opinion and dupe the media. They are called the Americans for Prosperity. In this case, it’s the Americans for Prosperity-California. Both groups are heavily funded by the Koch brothers, a now-notorious duo known for funneling millions into anti-union candidates and efforts nationwide.
In the case of lifeguards, the AFPC has produced a YouTube video that paints guards as enjoying the “Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous.” A “liberty” blog that parrots much of the video’s propaganda ran in the Orange County Register and was quickly picked up by NBC’s “Today Show” and MSNBC with the headline, “Dude, wanna make some big bucks? Try lifeguarding.” After reading that article, you’d think lifeguards nationwide are working on their tans and getting rich — they even have sunscreen allowances!
The truth is far less sexy. Chris Brewster, head of the United States Lifesaving Association, knows a thing or two about beach guarding. He wrote an excellent response to the pay smear campaign in our new LifeguardLink group on AI Connect. I urge everyone to read it.
In part, Brewster points out that the guards in question are full-time due to the year-round nature of Newport Beach, which is also the body surfing capital of the world. These full-time guards hold many of the same responsibilities as their full-time police and fire equivalents, but they typically get paid less.
Despite what the AFPC implies, the salaries are not the result of greedy unions. In California, it’s illegal for public employees to strike. Instead, elected officials have set the wages. Oh, and that $200,000 wage? It includes benefits and overtime. It represents full compensation of just two of the city’s full-time guards.
You won’t see many of these facts in the mainstream media. What you will see is a conflation of part-time seasonal guard pay with the pay of full-time supervisory lifeguards. Indeed, the final line of the MSNBC article smugly points out that the average lifeguard salary nationwide is about $20,000. This leads to a connection in the public’s mind between overpaid public employees and aquatics.
At a time when many aquatics facilities are fighting for their lives, this is the last thing we need. It’s up to you to set the record straight with your patrons before your guards and your facility get smeared, too.
